• In our refinery, the COD (chemical oxygen demand) of treated wastewater is analyzed in both laboratory and field analyzers. Lately, the COD in the analyzer has been increased by 4 times compared to the COD in the laboratory. We use the same method-Acidic Permanganate for both, but the additional AgNO3 is used for only the laboratory. However, the chloride content in treated wastewater hasn't been increased. What is the reason for the difference between the field analyzer and laboratory?



  • Peter Norman, Suez Water Technologies & Solutions, peter.norman@suez.com

    Sounds to me like the chloride went up enough to cause positive interference. Alternatively, nitrogen contamination (e.g. amines) increased, making the existing chloride interference much worse.



  • Responsive image Shut-off valves
  • Responsive image Tri block, double block and bleed valve from ZWICK
  • Responsive image PROVALVE® Fixed Valve
  • Responsive image Process catalysts
  • Responsive image Monthly technical bulletin
  • Responsive image OpX® Digital
  • Responsive image Digital Refinery
  • Responsive image ITW technologies online cleaning
  • Responsive image Trap more foulants with ActiPhase®
  • Responsive image Level and density in resid hydrocracking processes