• What is the basis for maintaining minimum wetting rates in vacuum column (whether based on vacuum charge or design condition?) What will happen if minimum wetting rates are not adhering to?



  • Eric Lin, Norton Engineering Consultants Inc., elin@nortonengr.com

    Minimum wetting rates are normally set by the packing vendor and should be exceeded by design. If for some odd reason the design flows are not enough to satisfy the minimum wetting rate set by the vendor, then maldistribution and possible channeling can occur (flow always follows the path of least resistance). Unwetted areas will have pure vapor bypass, leading to loss of component stripping and fractionation for that particular zone.

    Since we are addressing a vacuum column, then it will most likely be structured packing and not random packing. Structured packing typically does exhibit lower wetting rates than random packing. However, the aforementioned min wetting rates should be adhered to as vendors know where the drip points are and know their packing the best!



  • Marcio Wagner da Silva, Petrobras, marciows@petrobras.com.br

    The response for this question depends on a several parameters like the characteristics of the column internals as well as the mixture which will be separated.

    Considering that we are dealing with a vacuum column, there is a great chance that the equipment is operating with packing internals which presents lower pressure drop than the perforated plates. There is a several correlations in the literature capable to give an estimative for the minimum wetting rate of a separation column which relies on the characteristics of the fluids like viscosity, density, and temperature and the characteristics of the packing like applied material, if is stacked or random, geometric form, atc.

    An wetting rate below of the minimum will not conduct adequate mass and heat transfer rates, leading to poor performance of the separation column. In services with high temperature with hydrocarbons the low wetting rate can lead to premature coking deposition in the separation section leading a poor fractionating performance, high pressure drop and shorter operating lifecycle.



  • Responsive image Combustion control expert paper
  • Responsive image NSI Mobile Water Solutions
  • Responsive image Extensive tray portfolio from Sulzer
  • Responsive image Catalysts for optimal performance
  • Responsive image Shut-off valves
  • Responsive image Nasty stuff
  • Responsive image Asian Downstream Summit: 25-26 October
  • Responsive image Swagelok┬« Valves